ChangingMinds Web 

         

Home

Disciplines

Techniques

Principles

Explanations

Theories

Blog!

Quotes

Guest articles

Analysis

Book Reviews

Bookshop

Links

Caveat

Changes

Students!

Webmasters!

Contact

About

Guestbook

Site Map

Share this page:

Add to Google

 

 

Books and
more at:

USA:

In association with amazon.com

UK:

In Association with Amazon.co.uk

Canada:

In Association with amazon.ca

 

 

Affirming the Consequent

 

Disciplines Argument > Fallacies > Affirming the Consequent

Description | Discussion | Example | See also

 

Description

If A is true then B is true. B is true. Therefore A is true.

If B follows A, then you can assume you can go back the other way also.

Example

I am in London, England. I am in England, therefore I am in London.

If you are cheating on me, you will be out of the house a lot. You are out of the house a lot, so you must be cheating on me.

Discussion

This assumes that an if...then... statement is commutative, that given 'If A then B', you can also reverse it to 'If B then A'. The B, or 'then' part of the statement is called the 'consequent' (the A is the antecedent).

Affirming the Consequent is one of Aristotle's 13 fallacies.

Classification

Non-sequitur, Syllogistic

See also

Denying the Antecedent

 


 

  © Syque 2002-2008

TOP

Massive Content -- Maximum Speed