changingminds.org

How we change what others think, feel, believe and do

 

Disciplines

 

Techniques

 

Principles

 

Explanations

 

Theories

 

 

Home

 

Blog!

 

Quotes

 

Guest articles

 

Analysis

 

Books

 

Help us

 

Links

 

 

 

Cause-and-Effect Reasoning

 

Disciplines Argument > Types of reasoning > Cause-and-Effect Reasoning

Description | Example | Discussion | See also

 

Description

When you are presenting an argument, show the cause-and-effect that is in operation. Help the other person see why things have happened or will happen as they do.

Show purpose. Link things to higher values. Show the inevitable linkage between what happens first and what happens next. Go beyond correlation (that may show coincidence) to giving irrefutable evidence of causality.

If you cannot show causal linkage, then you may be successful just by asserting it, because few people will challenge a cause-and-effect assertion.

Example

 

Say this Not this
If I help you, you will be more successful. I will help you.
When the moon is high, things are abroad. Things are sometimes abroad.
The new additive to fuel makes your car go so much further. Add our new fuel additive to your car.

 

Discussion

We have deep needs for explanation and to be able to predict what will happen. We also need to be able to appear rational to others, and that they appear rational to us. When a person explains cause and effect, we are reassured that they are, indeed, reasonable people, and we hence trust them and their arguments more than we might otherwise do.

This need leads to psychological effects where you can offer a cause-and-effect argument that clearly has no real causal connection, yet it is surprising how many people will accept your argument without question. In a famous experiment, Ellen Langer et al were able to butt into a queue for a photocopier just by saying 'Can I use the photocopier because I want to use the photocopier' (yet without giving reason, the researcher was not allowed to jump the queue).

See also

Causal Fallacies, Need to explain, Need to predict, Need for rationality

 

Langer, E., Blank, A., & Chanowitz, B. (1978). The mindless of ostensibly thoughtful action: The role of “placebic” information in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(6), 635-642

 

More Kindle books:

And the big
paperback book


Add/share/save:


 

 


Save the rain


 

 


SalesProCentral

 

Contact Caveat About Students Webmasters Awards Guestbook Feedback Sitemap Changes

 

 

Quick links

Disciplines

* Argument

Brand management

* Change Management

Coaching
+
Communication

Counseling

Game Design

+ Human Resources

+ Job-finding

* Leadership

Marketing

Politics

+ Propaganda

+ Rhetoric

* Negotiation

* Psychoanalysis

* Sales

Sociology

+ Storytelling

+ Teaching
Warfare
Workplace design

 

Techniques

+ Assertiveness

* Body language

* Change techniques

* Closing techniques

+ Conversation

Confidence tricks

* Conversion

* Creative techniques

* General techniques

+ Happiness

+ Hypnotism

+ Interrogation

* Language

+ Listening

* Negotiation tactics

* Objection handling

+ Propaganda

* Problem-solving

* Public speaking

+ Questioning

Using repetition

* Resisting persuasion

+ Self-development

Sequential requests

Stress Management

* Tipping

Using humor

* Willpower

Principles

+ Principles

Explanations

* Behaviors

+ Beliefs

Brain stuff

Conditioning

+ Coping Mechanisms

+ Critical Theory

+ Culture

Decisions

* Emotions

Evolution

Gender

+ Games

Groups

+ Identity

+ Learning

Meaning

Memory

Motivation

+ Models

* Needs

+ Personality

+ Power

* Preferences

+ Research

Relationships

+ SIFT Model

+ Social Research

Stress

+ Trust

+ Values

Theories

* Alphabetic list

* Theory types

 


  © Changing Minds 2002-2013

  Massive Content -- Maximum Speed

TOP

.